Sponsored By:

[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

Subject: Re: MEADE QC
From: Robert Fields
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Wed Dec 14 00:56:32 1994

Steven;

I couldn't agree with you more. Unfortunately, not many people post their postive stories publically.

Perhaps some of us should post some of our success stories publically. Even better would be to post stories where *only* the LX200 could have done the job.

Now I realize that posting *good* things about a product isn't in keeping with the spirit of the InterNet <grin>, but why the heck do we keep these stories in our hip pockets ?

I'd say some good public stories, with a hint about the LX200 support group <grin>, could do no harm, and certainly could do some good.

-Robert

astrorcf@netcom.com

On Tue, 13 Dec 1994, Steven Williams wrote:

>
> I agree totally. I am sick and tierd of open public SLANDER without
> following all the avenues. Meade are not Gods, but they are very good at
> what they offer. They make a FANTASTIC telescope (LX-200). I find the
> service very good.


View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: HPP vs. SYNC accuracy, Robert Preston
Next message: Re: MEADE QC, Steven Williams
Next message in thread: Re: MEADE QC, Steven Williams
Previous message in thread: Re: MEADE QC, Carolyn Strong