Re: 40mm Meade vs. TeleVu 35mm Panoptic
| Subject: | Re: 40mm Meade vs. TeleVu 35mm Panoptic |
| From: | Tom Mote |
| Date: | Sun Apr 07 15:15:10 1996 |
T.J.,
The question is purely economic. If you have the disposable $$$,
the answer is obvious, the Panoptic. Also, some kind of counter-
weight system will be desirable.
Tom
On Apr 07, 1996 14:00:57, tjm@earthlink.net wrote:
>Hello to the group. This question is for a LX200 10" f/10:
>
>Anyone have a suggestion on which of these might be a better purchase?
Also,
>will I need counterweights when moving up to these larger eyepieces.
>
>Thanks,
>
>T.J. McCann
>tjm@earthlink.net
The question is purely economic. If you have the disposable $$$,
the answer is obvious, the Panoptic. Also, some kind of counter-
weight system will be desirable.
Tom
On Apr 07, 1996 14:00:57, tjm@earthlink.net wrote:
>Hello to the group. This question is for a LX200 10" f/10:
>
>Anyone have a suggestion on which of these might be a better purchase?
Also,
>will I need counterweights when moving up to these larger eyepieces.
>
>Thanks,
>
>T.J. McCann
>tjm@earthlink.net
