Sponsored By:

[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

Subject: Re: [M]: [M] LX200 12" Mag. range question
From: Stewart Squires
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Fri Oct 04 06:16:36 1996

Bill Arnett wrote,

>>Look for a Celstron 60mm or 80mm 2" eyepiece in the used market. These
> don't
>>have huge field of views, but in my CG14, at 3910mm fl, they provide great
>>viewing images.
>
>Have you measured the actual FOVs of these eyepieces? I would guess that
>since I'm getting vignetting with the focal reducer and the Panoptic 35
>that any further attempts to increase FOV would be fruitless.
>

The original poster wanted lower magnification, perhaps for a brighter image.
The FOV's in these eyepieces are in the 42-45 degree range. Eye relief is
huge. I like my 80mm better than my TV 55mm Plossl on many objects.

-

Stew Squires

... islands lie behind the sun that I shall raise ere day is done.
Bilbo's Last Song, J.R.R. Tolkien


View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Re: LX200 2-inch eyepieces 35mm vs 80mm?, Bill Arnett
Next message: Re: [M]: Re: LX200 2-inch eyepieces 35mm vs 80mm?, Stewart Squires
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: [M] LX200 12" Mag. range question, hobbes@mcbcm1.med.nyu.edu
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: [M] LX200 12" Mag. range question, R. Aguirre