Sponsored By:

[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

Subject: Re: [M]: 1.25 vs 2" EPs?
From: Arnaldo Arnal
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Fri Sep 19 03:43:28 1997

At 11:07 PM 9/18/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Of course then you'll want the 35mm Panoptic or the Meade 32mm SWA.
>I've looked through both and own the 32mm. Most people think the
>35mm is better, but probably they never looked through the 32mm.
>Hence it's a bargain used compared to the 35.
>

John, have you any idea on how do they compare with the Meade 40mm SWA ?

Thanks,
Arnaldo.


View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: LX200: Optics Question, Don Tabbutt
Next message: Re: [M]: polar align prob/416xt app., Don Tabbutt
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: 1.25 vs 2" EPs?, Kip Peterson
Previous message in thread: [M]: 1.25 vs 2" EPs?, Kip Peterson