Sponsored By:

[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

Subject: [M]: Re: LX200 clock and year 2000
From: g.n. paleologopoulos
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Tue Oct 21 02:48:11 1997

This question has been put a while back.
Relax, the LX200 does the millenium effortlessly!!
+----------------------------------------------------------
***| George N. Paleologopoulos
***| gpaleo@ath.forthnet.gr
***| gpaleo@ars.net.gr
***| http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/gpaleo (Astronomy Links)

-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Puttick <Nigel_Puttick@CompuServe.COM>
To: Mapug <mapug@shore.net>
Date: Δευτέρα, 20 Οκτωβρίου 1997 11:40 μμ
Subject: [M]: LX200 clock and year 2000


>A letter in this month's "Astronomy Now" (UK astro magazine) asks if
the
>LX200 clock/calendar will behave correctly in the year 2000. I take
this
>to mean (a) will it change date correctly after 31 Dec 1999, (b) will
it
>correctly recognise that there will be no Feb 29th 2000, and (c) will
>planetary positions be correct???
>
snip, snip

>>Nigel Puttick, UK



View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Meade central obstructions, Bill Arnett
Next message: Re: [M]: Goodbye, Chris Dugger
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: LX200 clock and year 2000, rlecker@juno.com
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: LX200 clock and year 2000, R. A. Greiner