Sponsored By:

[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

Subject: Re: [M]: LX200: 8 inch vs 10 inch
From: Ric L Ecker
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Sat Dec 27 00:01:26 1997



>1. Better motor for scope (they seem to be fragile, not to mention
>loud)
>2. Balancing weight system included with purchase
>3. The inclusion of a higher quality diagonal mirror
>4. A free 16" cassegrain for everyone
>
>need help with the rest-sugestions welcomed.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Jeffrey Gutkin
>Jeffrey@gutkin.com

1. The motors do seem small but they work just fine.
2. Everyone wants to drive up the cost of the scope.....the profit
margin for the retailer on the LX-200 is very small, they make their
profits by selling you accessories.
3. See number 2.
4. See number 5.
5. See number 4.

kinda like basic (computer language)



ric http://members.aol.com/rlecker/ric.html


View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: 7" Mak, Ric L Ecker
Next message: Re: [M]: Fuse Size, Ric L Ecker
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: LX200: 8 inch vs 10 inch, Michael C. Busby
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: LX200: 8 inch vs 10 inch, Ric L Ecker