Sponsored By:
[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

Subject: RE: [M]: Illuminated reticles compared
From: Heapy Chris CG
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Wed May 27 00:07:32 1998

What about eye-relief with the MA eyepiece? As an eyeglass wearer I find
the ER excessively short on the 9mm Plossel. I would prefer a longer FL
eyepiece with a short barlow I think.

Chris

>----------
>From: pmcguire@mmm.com[SMTP:pmcguire@mmm.com]
>Sent: 26 May 1998 15:27
>To: mapug@shore.net
>Subject: Re: [M]: Illuminated reticles compared
>
>In my experience, the 9mm Plossel is far superior to the Meade MA eyepiece.
>The plossel is more contrasty and has a wider field of view and higher
>magnification.
>
> Pat McGuire
>
>
>

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Mounting RF80, Bill Ezell
Next message: Re: [M]: How to control the LX-200 with a handheld PC, Bill Arnett
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: Illuminated reticles compared, R. A. Greiner
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Illuminated reticles compared, John F. Wall