Sponsored By:

[index] [month] [prev] [next]

Subject: Re: IMHO's wanted ... Eyepiec...
From: Todd Gross
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Tue Feb 28 01:35:49 1995

>Reply-To: lx200-l@netcom.com

>I have TV 55mm plossl, 27mm panoptic, 20mm and 13 mm Naglers. The 20mm is the
>best of the bunch (in my humble...). It's very bright and sharp and is my
>favorite eyepiece. Just don't drop it on your foot!

>Next in rank for me would be the 55, 27 and also the Meade 40mm SWA - all of
>which leave little to be desired.

>The 13mm is a new acquisition, and I haven't had time to really try it out.
>First impression was a bit disappointing as it was not as sharp as I was
>expecting. However, it could be my 'scope - I am waiting to try it out on
>others. I have heard other people rave about this eyepiece.

I just got the 16mm, but we are having an ice storm!

It will be awhile before I can evaluate it!

>I also have the Meade 8.8mm, which does a good job when the viewing permits
>the magnification.

-Todd ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Todd Gross Toddg@shore.net Meteorologist.... Channel 7, Boston (617)725-0805 Personal Wx Hotline: 976-6200 from 508 / 617 only runs 59c/min. >> recorded, available 24 hrs.


View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: LX200 Star Catalog Errors -Reply, Robert Fields
Next message: Re: ST-6 color images using an LX200, Gene.Greneker@gtri.gatech.edu