Sponsored By:

[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

Subject: Re: Experiences with quality of LX200-optics
From: Todd Gross
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Tue Jun 20 02:26:20 1995

>Because by area, it obstructs 11% of the light (16/144).
>This is nice marketing, but the physics of the matter is that the contrast
>reduction is proportional to the linear obstruction (4/12 = 33%), not to
>the light loss.

But only 11% of light gathering I take it?

-Todd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Todd Gross Channel 7 Meteorologist, Boston ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Email address: Toddg@shore.net WWW PAGE: http://www.shore.net/~toddg Work Phone#: (617)725-0777 24 Hr. Wx Hotline: 976-6200 (508 & 617 only - 59c/min)


View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: 35 mm Panoptic, Carolyn Strong
Next message: Re: tube-seeing?(was Experiences with quality of LX200-optics), LXmuto@subaru-soft.co.jp
Next message in thread: Re: Experiences with quality of LX200-optics, Todd Gross
Previous message in thread: Re: Experiences with quality of LX200-optics, Chris Westland