Sponsored By:

Subject: Re: second light
From: Pgoelz@aol.com
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Thu Mar 07 06:50:17 1996

In a message dated 96-03-06 14:44:19 EST, you write:

>Ok, I know I'd screw it up. Yes your correct it would be about half (.62x)
>what I said. Actually, I got the degree per hour part of sci.astro and
>never checked it. Thats still fast enough to actually watch it move
>real-time against the star background.

If it is as large as the predictions, and has a diffuse edge, wouldn't it be
difficult to actually see it move? For example, 6 acrseconds in ten seconds
sounds like a very small amount if the edges are not well defined. I assume
we will be using the lowest magnification available, unless the nucleus is
visible??

Paul